Research
Forecasting India's Fertilizer Volumes – Horizon 2030
Rabobank has undertaken forecasting of fertilizer consumption volumes in order to carve out a horizon for the Indian fertilizer industry up to 2030 by using...

Horizon – 2030
Consumption volumes in the Indian fertilizer industry are expected to rise at a 2.5% CAGR, from 61m metric tons in 2019 to about 78m metric tons in 2030 (see Figure 1). The fertilizer product portfolio will shift toward complexes and DAP, with the highest growth rates coming from complexes, followed by DAP (see Tables 1 and 2). No growth will be seen for SSP.
Figure 1: Indian fertilizer consumption, 2013-2030f
Table 1: Growth Rates yoy (in %)
Table 2: Product Portfolio Share (in %)
Figure 2: Actual and forecasted fertilizer volumes in India, 2013-2030f
Rationale for the Forecasting Methodology
The primary premise of time-series forecasting is that the patterns that emerge in the past will also materialize appreciably in the future. In recent years, Indian agriculture has been characterized by stable cropping areas and steady improvements in agriculture infrastructure and cropping practices. Also, the seasonality of agriculture trends in Kharif and Rabi are effectively captured through statistical time-series forecasting models, which have been deployed at monthly intervals. Unexpected events would also be captured by time-series forecasting models. For instance, weather disruptions are a fundamental part of Indian agriculture, and though disruptions are sporadic and in different locations every year, time-series forecasting models will appreciably account for these in the past trends, at an aggregated nationwide level. Also, fertilizer volumes data is captured through government infrastructure as a part of the subsidy regime, assuring its credibility. This makes the fertilizer sector amenable to time-series forecasting.
Possible Pattern Disruptors in Indian Agriculture Affecting Forecasts
It is also necessary to establish the circumstances in which the forecasts may become inappropriate for use. This would only happen in the case of a complete disruption of agricultural trends within the forecasting horizon of 2030. The advent of new technology in agriculture could be a potential cause (e.g. biotechnology). Also, a remarkable change in government policies (e.g. subsidies), which have been reasonably consistent since 2013, could disrupt fertilizer consumption patterns. Also, weather or climatic changes that affect the entire Indian agriculture industry might be considered a potential disruptor.
Indian agriculture has been fairly resilient to the situation imposed by Covid-19. Still, it might cause short-term distortions in consumption patterns. For example, precautionary purchases of farm inputs, which would not have been captured in the previous year’s patterns, would not get automatically captured in the time-series forecasting model at a monthly level. However, these forecasts would make considerable sense at an aggregated quarterly, semi-annual, or annual level.
A Glimpse Into the Forecasting Effort
Forecasting Model Details
Product | Urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), muriate of potash (MOP), complex fertilizers (containing all other fertilizer grades aggregated together) and single superphosphate (SSP) |
Time-series data | Primary sales of fertilizers happening from companies to distributors; All packs have been aggregated |
Geography covered | All India |
Model deployment | At the product level (i.e. each product has been modeled individually) |
Data source | Department of Fertilizers, Government of India, mFMS data, first point sales (all product groups) |
Units | Metric tons |
Time Unit | Month |
Time-series period | January 2013 to July 2020, 91 months |
Forecasted time period | August 2020 to December 2030, 125 months |
Forecasts generated | Monthly |
For Statistically Curious Eyes
Train data | January 2013 to December 2018, 72 months |
Test data | January 2019 to July 2020, 19 months |
Final model deployment | Entire time-series data for generating the forecasts |
Model classes evaluated | Holt-Winters models, regression models, ARIMA models, neural network autoregressive models |
Model selection tools | Data visualizations, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) |
This is an exclusive article
Log in or sign up to request access